That was nothing new. Using purchases assets in a game, for sure does not look good when they promised an AAA game,
It wasn't mentioned in your OP when I read it or at least I didn't notice that you mentioned it. So from my point of view, yes it was indeed new information. Not new in the sense that you/ me or some others didn't know the information but new in the sense that it was not shared in your opening post. Its possible one of the team members mentioned it in the comments here before I validated the claims. That doesn't take away from the importance of needing the Team Members claims confirmed to be true by others who are not team members.
but it doesn't break the law and is not immoral like re-selling them as NFTs without the artists' permission.
I'm no law expert, I already gave my opinion on how I view the parts of the contract as it was displayed in your original OP.
So you are aware of the over 600 K Hive transferred to exchanges too, right? (it's all on chain).
Why would someone be aware of that other than when it is being pointed out? If I invested thousands than sure maybe I would keep such a close eye on their on-goings but I didn't so here we are.I took part in handful of start-ups here on HIVE and I never once felt the need to track funds moved off chain. I always assume such a possibility for cost of operation/ cost of further growing the product/ company and onboarding.
And it wasn't misinformation, that's what their homepage stated. 7500 packs sold.
It was misinformation. You very well know how this works as you are a witness and have vast knowledge of the other play2earn games here on hive. Such games also have or at one point had the same type of advertising when it comes to "Sold" "CRATES". Not to mention the possibility that in-game tokens could of been used to trade for some CRATES which is not the same as selling for fiat. You also never considered any potential bonuses for bulk purchases/other. The part that makes it misinformation------->You then presented a number of received funds (Fiat) that wasn't true <---- that is the part that makes it misinformation. Its nitpicking but obviously distributed would be a better word for PSYBERX to use. You are not a newbie to this stuff.
Ok, so about 1 grand invested, at the current prices.
No, I'm not sure how you are calculating my invested value but if you were simply going by what my holdings are worth today that is not what I consider my invested amount nor is it the amount I would get if I were to try and sell everything in todays market. Either way its still a very tiny amount. I'm not hear due to my *-1K holdings in PSYBERX. In short I confirmed some facts and provided my opinion in my original response to your post. You proceeded to address me. I decided to entertain your inquires. That is all this is.
Of course, you are free to do as you please. More than warning people I can't do.
Indeed, will PSYBERX overcome all this. I don't know they now have a big mountain to climb. Only father time knows the outcome. The rest of us have to wait and see.
I don't agree on a couple of points but I don't see the point of keeping to discuss them.
And yes, time will tell.