Yes, sometime we're forced to buy the new stuff :)
Congrats! It seems to me it has quite good specs, did you get any new lens with it or you use your old lenses with a converter?
!PIZZA
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, sometime we're forced to buy the new stuff :)
Congrats! It seems to me it has quite good specs, did you get any new lens with it or you use your old lenses with a converter?
!PIZZA
Yeah, I did get Nikon 24-70 f4 lens too. That is directly for nikon mirrorless cameras. I also had to buy an adapter( fckn expensive, another 200eur 😀) to use other non mirrorless lenses I have.
Funny (actually not funny) how the prices of the "competitors" are almost the same.
I've never owned 24-70 lens, I've rented a few times though. Perfect for event and street photography, IMHO.
!PIZZA
That 24-70 is quite great for a kit lens. Usually, you don't get much performance out of a kit lens but this one seems to be different. Its also an S-line marked lens that marks the higher performance on mirrorless lenses. Same meaning as a golden ring on Nikon lenses and a red ring on canon DSLR lenses.
I think Nikon are doing a pretty good job with their lenses.
I have used 24-70 f/2.8 by Canon and I find a noticeable difference between their f/4.0 and the f/2.8 versions. Of course, the price is much bigger and it's heavier too.
!PIZZA
There is 2.8 available of my mirrorless lens too but yeah, it costs like crazy and comparing them side by side. I didnt find much difference, except the 2.8 light capabilityes. Maybe someday 😀
My original thought of the post, exactly! Too bloody expensive.
Moreover, probably not the best investment, unfortunately, given where the whole world is going to...
!PIZZA