What?! @edwinedwin, only Freud could make such an association to online voting.
I don't see anything wrong with it, but fair enough. But why should I ping them to vote for you? I wanted A Clockwork Orange to win, because it was written in the 70's. It was against my own interest to have them voting!
At most, you could've pinged them (unless you think is a substitute to an invitation to love, but I can assure that nobody else is as Freudian as you on this!)
Nobody says to “ping on me”. Just ping to leave a vote. You are administrator/organizer so it should be your job. But ok. I can ping people to remind the the poll is abandoned and only @ipa voted
Yes. That's a good idea. It ensures everyone's aware of the voting and then of the final decision that has been made. The question is: - who should we mention exactly; those who have attended last time, or anyone who has ever attended? And where should we mention them? I am of the idea that it's much simpler if you directly reach to the people you think can vote for you.
We can discuss it before or after the next meeting! :)
Okay 👍🏻 to be continued
Guys, but don't you think it would be unfair that some people will be reminded to vote while others will not? I admit that I forgot about the poll, but that’s the point of democracy, who votes, chooses the book. We can discuss it at the meeting of Konfraternia, it’s an interesting matter :)
So remind everyone who ever been on book club 💁🏻♂️
The part of democracy is turnout level