Measured By Popularity Ratings

in GEMS5 days ago

Remember when popularity was simply about who sat at which lunch table or who got invited to weekend parties?

This was back in the days when popularity had tangible boundaries, you could only be as known as your physical presence allowed.

Today, we've inherited a digital scoreboard. What it measures exactly is hard to tell, beyond popularity.

Because metrics can be bought, manufactured, and algorithmically amplified, but social worth is definitely one of the many illusions it sells to eager minds.

Humans are social creatures desperate for connection. The irony is that in our quest to be seen by everyone, we end up being truly known by no one.

As someone who has always preferred to observe rather than perform in this modern social circus,

I've noticed how the pursuit of popularity has an influence on how people construct their digital personas. Some going as far as altering their authentic selves to fit trending narratives.

Arguably, especially of the generation of my kind, it's more tilted towards mastering the art of digital appearance than genuine human connection.

As Shakespeare said, the [digital] world is indeed a stage, and we are merely players, though now our performances can run 24/7.

The Digital Stage

Another irony is how easy it has become to spot the desperate chase for validation beneath carefully crafted posts.


Image Source

Previously, before many came online, I think it was quite hard for most people to witness the extent of human insecurity and our collective need for approval.

Now, it's there for us to view, provided we know how to look for it, of course.

Maybe it's not an irony, more of a paradox: the more we try hiding a truth, the easier it gets to spot it out, even when it's buried under layers of filters.

After observing this digital theater for keenly for some time, I think it's a logical next step to wonder on what truly drives this rather subconscious pursuit of likes and follows. Is popularity a smokescreen for something deeper, something more fundamental to human nature?

Going back to the premise that we're social creatures desperate for connection, you could say behind every check of engagement metrics, lies a more primal hunger. Maybe it's that ancient desire to know we belong somewhere or the proof that their existence matters, that their voice carries weight in this vast digital void.

The latter is definitely a wonderful thing to experience, knowing that your voice can inspire, comfort, or help others navigate their own journeys.

Keep in mind that there's a flimsy line between influence and manipulation. There are those who seek influence, or dare I say, power – the intoxicating ability to sway opinions, to make ripples in the collective consciousness.


Image Source

Behind the Numbers

Real connections require vulnerability, time, and the courage to be imperfect – all the things carefully curated online presence tries to avoid.

Speaking of avoiding, I've been asked why I prefer the shadows to the spotlight. Why not join the dance? Why not play the game?

The truth is, I don't know. It's not even about being antisocial or particularly introverted.

There's a certain freedom in being an observer, in stepping back from the performance. You start to see patterns others miss, understand motivations others overlook.

Of course, this is in no way an excuse to not get in the field and experience life. The richest experiences come from being both participant and witness in this grand social experiment.


Thanks for reading!! Share your thoughts below on the comments.