It is quite rare and I'm also someone against zero'ing posts and have always been, it's enough to reduce the rewards and fend off the maximizers who previously to this HF would stick on anything getting big votes for the returns. It's especially rare because the person in your example has quite a rare antagonizing, sockpuppet/fake ID history behind him that may cause people to want to zero him out, even if I still don't agree with that as it comes off as personal more than just wanting to reduce rewards to save the rewardspool from it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: