I chimed in on this one too. I think 50/50 is good. Author rewards are higher than anywhere because investors feel good about the way things are. I don't think the price/rewards will be as good if we change it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I wouldn't really change anything either. It's just that I saw Calumam's post talking about that proposed change and it occurred to me to give mine. This 60-40 numbers is something I've been thinking about since STEEM. It has always seemed fairer to me for everyone. 75-25 doesn't take into account investors or people who just curate, 60-40 is pretty close to 50-50 giving only 10% more to the content creators who are, I think, the reason for being of a social network of blogs.
This can happens for sure with a drastic change as it could be 75-25.