I had suggested that instead of burning the tokens for it to be set as a @pob-fund beneficiary post. That way pepl still get curation rewards and we get more funding for the project in the future but the reply I got was that isn’t burning tokens and he wasn’t interested because we already have the Friday POB-Fund Beneficiary posts already going. Others commented under my idea and liked it but it went no where.
I don’t think they should get burned either but am guilty of upvoting the posts. I will personally stop upvoting the burn posts. Glad we have this convo going.
Maybe we should create a handful of witnesses for POB to make these decisions.
I think this is a much better way of utilising a daily post that adds value to the platform. We haven't really dove into how liquid funds should be managed on the @proofofbrainio account but I have the opinion that using those for funding has some ethical problems which we still have to explore (or at least learn more about from proofofbrainio).
Everyone with stake is technically a witness (in simple terms) and I believe there are plans to introduce a governance bot to the platform to help with proposals and decisions. This means that distribution, already priority number one imo, is even more important for the long-term success of the platform.
There has to be a better use than just burning the tokens. I think the POB-Fund is the way to go. As far as ethical problems with using the liquid coins for funding future growth of the project could be figured out with the man and some community discussion.