To give an opinion you must read the whole thing and go back to the past, all of us here have benefited thanks to @calumam who sacrificed his earnings to give away and delegate to many of those who comment here, while @onealfa only accumulates for him and a group of Leofinance . That is not bad either because everyone does what they want with their people.
What @Calumam tries to show is that it does not matter how good your content may be in POB, but you are in Leofinance worth 1 cent.
In hindsight, think where would @caluman be now if the POB that he has won all these months was used to grow his account and therefore his vote?
I would like, although I very much doubt it, to see an initiative of @onealfa that promotes the interaction and growth of POB ...
I think I got excited for a second and lost my mind ...
But that's it!
What I say, don't run away from it!
I've always said in my posts that everyone does what they want and about what is right and wrong. Despite having to have a sense of things and common sense.
What @calumam has done and is doing has helped many people, including me. I'm grateful for the way he supports and creates. At the same time @onealfa also helped me a lot with the votes and Toruk (if I'm not mistaken about the name) for example. The same @onealfa has repeatedly posted the style he likes to read and vote on. He doesn't like who votes for himself and some content. He analyzes first and blocks if he doesn't like it. Is this having a lot of EGO? Maybe yes or no. It's your way. And for what he's accumulated over time and the time he spends manually reading content, voting, and adding valuable content (in his opinion), it's right for him. Just as @calumam uses its contests, the way it reads and votes and, above all, gives away its resources to reward. Each one looks and invests in their own way. @Calumam is one of the people who "lost" POB the most by helping others. I see others trying to be the cool guy here and promoting, but they don't give up their earnings close to 1/3 of what @calumam has already done. And these people still want to say they're thinking about the community, but in the end it's for their own gain. Just like EVERYONE in the end wants to win too. But is this person wrong? I don't know what's wrong? It's the sight of several people saying yes and no exactly like mine now. Just as many are here talking right now. Freedom is for everyone. But your freedom cannot interfere with the freedom of others... That is.
The fight cannot harm others who have nothing against it or both. I've never had anything against @onealfa that helps a lot with their strong 100% vote just as @calumam helps a lot in distributing their net earnings. Though I understand and clearly see their conflicting minds and strong opinions. xDD
Like Fabio, I think that if we put both parties on a balance I agree with @calumam regardless of whether they vote against me or do not give me votes, I think that when something has to be said and it is well said, it cannot fall just to please a great vote.
I think that whoever dares to make the article of a statistics between the two, the results that they throw will be clearer and they will understand what is being raised.
If I knew what tools to use and how to do it, I would apply for free to the job regardless of the delegation, I think it would open the eyes of many!
yes I agree with you
In fact, some of my posts on POB were always some sort of visions of what I saw happening in the community. But, of course, in a more "Indirect" way
And even before all that, I was already thinking about a post to write and that now only motivated me to create it xD