This afternoon, I found myself thinking about my former brother-in-law.
This was a really intelligent young man, and you might say that he definitely had a brain — at least from the perspective of being very intelligent; being offered a full-ride scholarship to Architecture School at the University of Texas — yet he was also someone who had zero desire to be involved in any activities that required "thinking."
In fact — he was in his late teens and early 20's at the time — he chose to be a landscaper's helper (in the hot Texas sun) and when he wasn't digging holes, cutting lawns and trimming branches from bushes, and whenever he wasn't working, his preference was to sit under a tree with a beer and get "baked," long before the legalization of marijuana.
I bring him up here simply as an illustration of how "having a brain" really doesn't mean anything, in and of itself.
It invites the additional statement "Sure, you have a brain. But what are you DOING with it?"
Well-Versed?
I have met plenty of "super smart" people who pretty much weren't capable of tasks as simple as going grocery shopping or doing a load of laundry. But they certainly were book smart. And they would engage in seemingly endless gyrations of intellectual masturbation while sitting in their tiny apartments, surrounded by a pigsty of old food delivery containers, empty beer cans and pizza boxes.
I've also met some fairly brilliant people who might be described as being as close to "truly EVIL" as you are likely to get. Sociopaths sometimes can be quite charming and brilliant. Sociopathy doesn't by any means imply stupidity.
Conversely, I know plenty of pretty middle of the road brains who absolutely make the most of what they do have, all the time. Typically, they are some of the more well-balanced people I encounter.
So where am I going, with all this?
What Does "Proof of Brain" Really Mean?
Moreover, who gets to be the arbiter(s) in making such an assessment?
I ended up down this particular rabbit hole as a result of encountering those who seem to think that the "Proof of Brain" community is some kind of intellectual think tank, and unless you have an IQ of 150, you might as well not show up.
Which I have not at all found to be true.
Considering this whole ball of wax brings to mind a different question that has often been punted around, in the context of Hive and its communities: "Quality Content" vs. "Adding Value."
I have never really been a slave to quality content, as long as whatever is being submitted to the information stream adds VALUE, in some sense. And even that is pretty ambiguous, since what's "valuable" to one person may feel like a boring waste of time to another.
Of course, what does tend to grind a lot of people's gears is the commonly held belief (particularly by "smart" people!) that if somebody can't see and agree with their perspective, they must be lacking in the brain department.
So maybe the real "Proof of Brain" happens when we're able and willing to recognize our own cognitive biases...
In many ways, I am like my former brother-in-law... at least in the sense that I have failed to live up to the external world's perception of what I SHOULD have done with my life. But I'm not convince that "Proof of AMBITION" is the same thing as "Proof of BRAIN!"
Thanks for reading, and have a great remainder of your week!
How about YOU? What do YOU think constitutes "Proof of Brain?" Comments, feedback and other interaction is invited and welcomed! Because — after all — SOCIAL content is about interacting, right? Leave a comment — share your experiences — be part of the conversation!
Greetings bloggers and social content creators! This article was created via PeakD, a blogging application that's part of the Hive Social Content Experience. If you're a blogger, writer, poet, artist, vlogger, musician or other creative content wizard, come join us! Hive is a little "different" because it's not run by a "company;" it operates via the consensus of its users and your content can't be banned, censored, taken down or demonetized. And that COUNTS for something, in these uncertain times! So if you're ready for the next generation of social content where YOU retain ownership and control, come by and learn about Hive and make an account!
(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly and uniquely for this platform — NOT cross posted anywhere else!)
Created at 20210728 23:45 PDT
0309/1552
Ambition has nothing to do with intelligence - they are two completely different 'qualities'.
Those with considerably higher IQ's (maybe your brother in law) tend to be higher in autistic traits (not autism).
Having autistic traits can mean a lack of social skills - unlike the midwit for example, who excel at these skills.
Those expressing higher autistic traits are more interested in content - objective reality - rather than image - subjective reality. (political games playing and social influence, etc)
'Simple work' is often a choice - As it puts food on the table, while leaving their brain to think .
I think its impossible for those materially minded to believe (or even be able to grasp) this concept.
Hive is great example of this.
Your content has been voted as a part of Encouragement program. Keep up the good work!
Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!
Support Ecency
Vote for Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more
A great write up you have here .
Considering the level of the contents , i do agree with you that the real " Proof of brains" is not about intelligence or brilliance but about the values and information such individuals dish out.
Growing up i discovered those guys in high school who were tagged brilliant or intelligent because of the ability to pass exams as proof of brains eventually dropped out of college due to failure to meet up with required scores. Furthermore the so called average students suddenly became the geniuses in college , are we to say they suddenly became intelligent and lacked proof of brains in high school?
I totally agree with you that "intelligence "
and "Proof of brains " are totally different from "Values " and believe we portray as individuals.
I guess someone forgot to tell the "big shots" this is exactly why scrolling exist.
A book person can be intelligent, but as I've heard said "common sense ain't so common." The young man you described sounds like my brother in many ways. Interesting and thought provoking as per usual.
Today so many different meanings have been given to what is "intelligent" that I believe that everyone makes a concept in their own way. Nobody is so smart or so "dumb" to me. The smart or brainy one does stupid things and the fool sometimes also has his intelligence moments.
Many are lazy to think or simply do not believe it is necessary. There is also motivation (if they have it). And ready. It's okay for them.
Look, I consider myself an intelligent person and you are raising something interesting in your publication. And what did I do? I was reading, but from the second photo my attention focused on the fact that they were very beautiful flowers and I looked for the other photographs BEFORE I finished reading ... and it was not because the subject did not interest me.
Does that make me mindless? I don `t believe.
It's just my rhythm.
On the blockchain proof of brain often means agreeing with he who has the most blubber...