That part you quoted is reason enough not to support this organization. I support going after spam, plagiarism, and abuse (mostly doxing or something serious).
Beyond that there is no reason for a down vote that I personally think is justified. Not even the reward pool. If they want to do reward pool policing then there should be a cap of an amount beyond which EVERY SINGLE post is down voted to protect the pool. This way it is not subjectively people deciding what they didn't like or find interesting themselves didn't deserve to be rewarded. It ends up being an umbrella they hide under to justify down votes based upon opinion.