You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: You cannot take away from the author that which does not belong to the author.

in Proof of Brain4 years ago (edited)

So if I for example decide there are no good reasons for movement X thus anyone advocating movement X must be lying then by their logic if I have sufficient power I should be able to make it possible to down vote so no one can ever be rewarded for writing about movement X again... unless they do so in a way that I approve of. Otherwise they are lying. I afterall am the arbiter of truth.

By extension a decade ago if we talk about UFOs we are lying and spreading misinformation. No one can talk about that. We can't pay for that product and by extension no one will post about it because they can't be rewarded for their time and effort.

Yet fast forward and now official sources are putting out UFO content. I guess those people that were banned were not lying.

Or how about the conspiracy theorists being called kooks because they said vaccine passports would be coming, or things like mandatory vaccination or you are fired. Those were called lies.

Yet they are now very real.

Some ASSHOLES (used the label intentionally) deciding what is the truth and what is lies should never be acceptable on this platform.

Sort:  

I afterall am the arbiter of truth.

Did Hive Watchers really say they go after people who prefer natural remedies over vaccines?