Without good content their financial investment quickly becomes worthless. Also if they pay enough attention to gaming they should realize games don't tend to remain dominant. Their actions also scare away serious developers. I had plans for some games years ago around the time Steem Monsters first dropped but I lost interest due to the behavior of the down voters and how they seem more interested in being authoritarian than making a vibrant free community. They think they need to police things they don't like. Really they should just focus on the things they like and it'd all balance out.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Clearly they don't seek balance, but to heavily weight the balance in their favor. I have advocated in years past that means of reducing the weight of stake on governance be implemented, to prevent plutocracy from being the only possible form of governance on Hive (then Steem), but my suggestions were hand waved away, and Steem became exactly the plutocratic tyranny I sought to prevent.
Hive awaits that development, and endures the preparatory softening up in the meantime.