You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A friendly consideration to non-affirmative behaviour in the matter of sex.

in Proof of Brain7 months ago (edited)

Furthering the deranging power of lawfare are biologically insuperable laws regarding majority

it is actually impossible to be in compliance with all laws regarding these matters, facilitating arbitrary law enforcement

True.

If legislation sees itself as a central moral authority, it abuses what it has not been given.

It may determine what happens when someone breaks moral principles, but it must not itself call upon and encourage people to decide against their own conscience and reality.

The new "self-determination laws" all over the world do just that: they say that anyone who wants to can declare reality and objectivity to be an idea in their own head.

This is the famous scene in films where the bully asks: "How many fingers do I show?" (pointing four fingers) and the person being asked has to answer that "there are five fingers".

It is probably the worst of all forms of driving a person to despair to tell him that what he sees objectively not only does not have to be denied by him, but also that it should be denied voluntarily and gladly.
Wasting one's precious life time dealing with bullies who now show up in classes as children is often more than anyone who knows full well that reality MUST be objectifiable can handle.

It seems to be the ultimate maturity test for all of us.
We must stay cool.

I am absolutely certain you know from experience that respondents answer lots of things besides 'no'.

I do. Although they do answer "no" (because they cannot beat logic) but eagerly put a "but" behind it. You gotta catch them before they get into the "buts".