I like your take on this, I was never a fan of "The more you stake, the more power of decision you have" (although that's the way the cookie crumble everywhere)
I have no clue on where we will go from here, or how this governance thing will end up. I think merit can be a good ideia, but would we vote? Would we claim? Would it be a consensus or decided by proofofbrainio? Again, I have no ideia, maybe we should just use a virtual dice and do things as the universe decides... hehehe
Thanks for sharing, this is a good food for thought!
If there was a voting system, it would not be bad, the only thing that I see as not convenient is the time. The community is too young to nominate someone who does not see the fruits in the community.
You are doing an excellent job friend, you try at all costs to achieve not only commitment, but increase interaction, and in your profile I have not seen that in repeated weeks you ask or propose a governance, instead other colleagues do, and when You see his trajectory, he says nothing ...
It is where they show that it seems more a partisan sentiment than in search of something collective!