... when it comes to adjustments to the rewards, if there's to be any, I'd go with 60-40 as the right balance.
It is the most feasible adjustment I see, and I think it would have its advantages over the 50-50 as well.
If there are rules, they will be gamed so we can only hope that those who have accumulated large stakes use their positions wisely.
The most important thing in the game is the players. For now I think the "whales" we have are positive "whales" :) which is good.
Make it 75-25, and this will instantly turn a "positive" whales in to "negative" whales.
At least one.
But I have a little doubt there will be only one...
This 75-25 reminds me of STEEMIT, which (I always had hopes) went away from my life once and for ever.
Good to have you around giving your point of view :)
hahaha I have that doubt too.
What you say about the 75-25 numbers I can imagine (I also knew Steemit) and your negative response to that change is not surprising either, especially from the point of view of someone who has invested in the token.
My question would be, how much of an affect would you see if 60-40 numbers were handled?
I think the present 50-50 ratio has not reasons to be changed.
The 60-40 move would noticeably reduce my manual curation time, but probably will not yet trigger the start of removement of my investments in POB. At least - I would stop buying, and will direct my excess funds into other directions, other tribes
Thanks for the answer.
I actually do not want to change anything, but I read about the idea of change and I personally don't like 75-25 either. I decided to contribute to the debate with the 60-40 numbers that I've been thinking about since I was in STEEMit.