Sort:  

Because i don't want to tell people on POB, that they're too bad for my magazine. I don't want any drama, if somebody misses a deadline and I don't have anything to offer to a great author. They can already make more on their own.

I like to keep it simple. I might change my mind later on. I even said so in the post.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

I reminds me of Cal's metrics. You're providing content you believe is high-quality for the world to see. It would be the group's action to review it and, if willing, meet that standard. I liked it from the start.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Thanks. I remember.

You are providing alot of value to the community, too. :)


Posted via proofofbrain.io