News or Porn?

in Proof of Brain3 years ago

In order to view disturbing news which concerns the 3+ year old, you must be 18 or older and you cannot just click "I'm 18 or older" to view the content: It does concern 3 year olds after all.

image.png

In order to view photos of naked young women, you also must be 18 years or older but you can simply click "I'm 18 or older" and the website trusts you.
image.png

🤔

Sort:  

Lol boycott that site so they don't get anymore web traffic, or at bare minimum use a ad blocker. That's trash censorship lol

This is really sad. In the end, they only care about clicks and money. The internet has ended the morals and childhood of many since the beginning of their existence, and never really effective measures were taken.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Honestly what these people care about is more clicks more money, not really whether the viewers are of age - all these are what really contributes to high level of immorality in our society today.
To curb all these excesses, parents should guide their children on the internet and social medias.

But is there really no way to prevent all these young viewers from accessing the age restricted sites?


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Their motive is to have more viewers in thier site so why wont they not trust anyone