Let me first underline that I wasn't accusing you of posting AI generated content - I merely pointed out your post read like it was, and that an AI detection software also said it was highly likely. I also think it's great that you bring up the topic for discussion and giving it such serious consideration.
but I would rather make it more convenient for me and take advantage of the technological evolution in front of me
I totally agree on the part of taking advantage of new technology. The problem arise when it doesn't look like your content anymore. This was the case (in my opinion of course) in your post from yesterday that I commented on. Much of the phrasing oozed machine written in my mind - it's easy to tell when you've been playing around with LLMs for a bit. I don't doubt for a second that that article (and your other content) is original. Problem is that it looks AI-written after the "improvement", and is also detected as such. As a concrete suggestion, what if you tried to leave out the "improve" parameter in your prompt, and ask it only to correct grammar?
Honestly, reading the first half of this post, it looks like you write perfectly good English on your own without assistance. In the case of this post in general, both the part before and after AI improvement, I think looks human written.
Anyways and to be clear, I'm not trying to do any sort of policing around here, just trying to help :)
I am sorry, I did not mean that way where you feel that I am offended by pointing that matter out on my post, instead, I am grateful because I did not know it was actually detected as AI-Generated and it will help me a lot moving forward and it will go a long way.
I am mainly thankful for this suggestion, this is probably the way the content won't look so machine written, and will surely do this moving forward.
Yes, I think I was doing fine without GPT, but Idk I like it more when I use it lol. Nonetheless I am so thankful for you for bringing it up to my attention.