I said that example you're providing wouldn't work here in this scenario. Offered several flaws with it and could keep going. The main flaw though is the fact it can be used/exploited easily by anyone who wants attention to their product with the simple push of a button. Since it's voluntary and will be used to cry wolf, most will ignore, and the entire system breaks itself probably within the first day of going live. There's no point in even talking about this again. I debunked that system already when applied to what we do here.
You're not even working out the odds or doing any thinking beyond what your device is feeding you. Do you know how long it would take to process ONE flag by choosing 1000 accounts at random? That could take years.
you seemed to suggest a decentralized jury would never work "irl"
this is a humorous example or a real world field test and proof of concept
I said that example you're providing wouldn't work here in this scenario. Offered several flaws with it and could keep going. The main flaw though is the fact it can be used/exploited easily by anyone who wants attention to their product with the simple push of a button. Since it's voluntary and will be used to cry wolf, most will ignore, and the entire system breaks itself probably within the first day of going live. There's no point in even talking about this again. I debunked that system already when applied to what we do here.
You're not even working out the odds or doing any thinking beyond what your device is feeding you. Do you know how long it would take to process ONE flag by choosing 1000 accounts at random? That could take years.
it's a concept.
not an immutable stone tablet.
i found a better example for you.
i appreciate your critique.
I took elements from that idea and offered a potential solution already that doesn't waste time dealing with petty nonsense.
sure.
the concept of a decentralized jury system does appear to be feasible "irl"