You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: As we continue this ‘experiment’ known as the “Proof of Brain” tribe, it is now abundantly clear that ‘Proof of Stake’ governance is not the way

in Proof of Brain4 years ago

I wonder how the "DV-removers" imagine they will be able to fight against abusers, leeches, circle-jerkers, malicious players? With one MUTE button, and the MUTE keys in the hands of ONE SINGLE person?
Does anyone at all believe the tribe founder will ever share his account's keys with anyone else on this planet ? You do? Seriously?
You want this level of centralization???

With DV button in the hands of every participant (and any time, any day), we have at least some certain level of self-regulation. Do you want to remove this totally, and leave everything up to the mercy of ONE SINGLE person? A person who have enough reasons to be 100% anonymous?
What are his secret, long term plans?

Instead of abstract warnings "there may be a powerful abuser(whale) one day, which you possibly will have to stop somehow", I clearly said - this whale is HERE, already, TODAY, and he knows how to do BAD things. And there will be more, many more of such abusers. Just open the gates for them.

It is not "IF", its only "when" this happens.

There is no other, more important thing for the prosperity of POB tribe, than keeping the DV feature available to everyone & all the time.
To save this feature, I see there is no limit on the measures. Anything GOES
Even open threats.
Because many people only understand this type of language.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  
Loading...

Haha, we both know what is going on here. Lets say: 100 guys with 1K POB stake in total wants to rule 1 guy with 50K stake and tell him which post he can vote 100% and which he can't . That's proof of communism. Let them do it and they will end with nothing.
To be clear, I'm talking about max-payout idea, it must be implemented after removing downvotes

max-payout idea is great ! I always thought about it.