You're right, there is a lot of inequality in content curation. I've seen great content being ignored, and low-maintenance content highly rewarded. Sometimes when I see it, I think that I do not know if it is luck or a matter of being a friend of a whale. But, wait ... whales get along with whales (mere truth). What makes the system fall into abuse, closes doors to new content creators and also, it is always the same people who lead the trend positions ... And I have seen it in all the tribes, not only in POB . I think it is a difficult evil to correct. Nepotism has existed since before Christ. But, putting that aside ... regarding the rewards, 50% to 50% is good if the creator receives good votes, it could give him an opportunity to generate money for himself and stake. But, if the context is: receive small votes? then you have to decide (there is no other way). But it is also fair because it allows the curator to earn money. In sound mind, 50/50 is fair. This is deeper, I don't want to swim here.. JJ. (I'll have my cup of coffee in peace)
Greetings. Have a wonderful day.!
Go welcome to the club in case I share a large part of your points, but I also give some credit to those who vote, it is a sea of content overnight in pob, I think it happens due to the fact that there are no rules about that you can publish or not, that's why you see that we have a complete and beautiful chaos within pob, where you can find statistics of the tennis open (Is there not an exclusive tribe for sports) or you can also see how repairing a guitar has a lot of relevance, is where you understand that everything is subjective, linked to what I call, TIME, FACTOR and SPACE, when these three come together, no matter how good or bad your article is, it will be fine for you!
LOL. A holy rough sea!