Well, unfortunately, they are not required to give a reason for DV'ing any more than others that give an upvote. However, it would be nice because it could at least clear up the reason why.
First DV: Let's go back about 10 days to this post: Hive communities a citadel of getting new ideas and then compare it to this post: Switzerland aiming for fresh record against Spain. The quality is remarkably different. It seems like you rushed quite a bit on that first post. English grammar issues also make the first post look like a jumble of words to a degree.
The following posts look like spam in that they have large images with little writing. I would expect to see messages like this on D.Buzz as that platform is like Twitter.
- Italy play against Spain tonight in Wembley for a place in the final round,who do you think will go through,what is your take on their performance so far and who are you tipping to reach the final??
- The heavy weight battle in Wembley tonight (Italy vs Spain)
- Expectional Azzurri's booked thier place in the final
The following post doesn't strike me as spam, but again, it looks like it was put together quickly. I don't think I would have DV'd it, but I wouldn't have voted on it either.
I've been curating engagement in the comment section in POB. You comment a lot. Your comments lean on the higher side of quality. I would expect similar quality from the posts above. It's just not there. Of course, this is just my opinion. I can't speak for the people who DV'd your post.
How are you with mark-down? Have you taken a look at other articles for comparison?
Not really,but will actually look to into it
Thanks boss
You're very welcome. I hope it helps. Let me know and I can dig up some articles that have helped me.