@AMR is this type of analysis available on your tool. If so, could I use it to compare multiple authors. At this point, I spend hours reading articles daily. I minimize a full upvote as much as I can.
Is 500+ unique authors good? bad? I changed my voting behavior based on one of @onealfa's posts: Lower VP over higher distribution of authors.
onealfa upvoted 800+ in one of your linked posts about him. That's incredible. I found myself going from tag to tag at some point reading posts. It was exhausting doing things manually. I don't know that I'll be able to approach that...ever. But I'll continue working towards it. I'm always interesting in the behaviors of veterans as it is representative of a portion of the community.
@AMR do you think, at the end of your series of POB whales, you can do a current summary comparison of POB whales? I'd just like to see the impact of your presentations on our behaviors, if any. Also, I'd like to see how we differ amongst each other.
Your chart of votes is interesting. I have higher rate of voting and voting power when I'm
- Working from Home (during breaks at home)
- On a lunch break at work
- After I put the kids to bed at home
Thanks for the report.
I run a curation project on another site, and i am hitting aroudn 220 unique Authors, so 500 is pretty good I think. But it is always good to set higher goals.
Oh. Ok. I will keep moving forward then. I can keep the same pace. I doubt I can do more though. I'm only human.
Yes of course, you are allowed to celebrate your efforts too. What do you use for checking plagiarism?
I use this tool but it does take some time, https://www.duplichecker.com/