If downvote is the only way then do you think there should be guidlines of what situation a user should express their right to downvote on Proof of Brain?
Thought the only reason for a user to downvote any content was if the content is plagiarized! Is there more to downvoting than this(plagiarism)?
This is the exact topic od discussion in community. Should downvotes be given for abuse of the reward pool? Should downvotes be given for spam? Who should give the downvotes and should we be responsible before the community for any downvote given?
Spam ain't good so in my opinion I think if a content contains spam then the downvote is worth it.
Everyone has his or her powers to either upvote or downvote a post. When it comes to downvoting a post, I think a particular reason should be given by the user who downvoted the post in the comment section so everyone could know the reason that triggered the post to be downvoted.