Cool, maybe programmers will institute this or many of the other viable options that have been suggested to counter such abuse into the code. Until then it is just a reality of the blockchain we all must live with, which is fine, just sad such behavior is driving away good content creators and discouraging new users on an otherwise thriving and growing platform
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not as code, but as custom.
If the 33 accounts impacted by a 1000mv limit voted with all their strength now they would suck up all the rewards, so it's not like they don't already exercise constraint.
It is much better than when we had the n2.
If we had this 1000mv limit, we could look at bringing that back as a superior content finder.
I doubt anybody that can afford to pay a dev is likely to pay him in order to cut his own paydays out of the code, seems a bit much to ask, but if the crowd calls for it, probably should give it to them.
If everybody leaves, they can keep their coins for all the good it will do them.
If Satoshi had kept it all we wouldn't even know what btc was.
Hive could be a faucet handing out whole btc's in 2009, if we play the cards right.