how would you be able to tell? What you show for examples are bottom of the barrel, run of the mill AI images one can spot a mile away. I know artists in my circles that use AI to develop their ideas (and so do I) which saves on sketching paper. I trained AI on my own past artwork, which flows into my results. Some of these results find their way onto my canvas, in the further process it gets massaged around, changed etc. If I take a AI generated piece which I based on my trained drawing lora, and I use it in my analog painting, how would you be able to tell? Or, what is the difference of Rauschenberg using solvent transfer to reproduce an image on his canvas, as opposed to me printing the result from an AI creation and overpainting it? There are all kinds of ways to skin a cat. AI is a tool, period.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: