You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LUV command by itself

in LUVHBIT Community3 years ago (edited)

This is something I've thought about. With LUV, I like to have the reply/confirmation on. Two reasons, one, I think most people like some type of confirmation. (I know they can check it in an H-E explorer, but people aren't really going to do that.) Two, the goal is to give love, something positive and encouraging (LUV the token is just a bonus). By removing the message and allowing things to run silently in the background, this is diminished in my view.

I've actually had users fuss at me about this when I turned the replies off for a time to conserve RCs. Their premise was something like this: LUV was not following its intended goal and now it's just become nothing but a selfish mining token!

With HBIT, the reply/confirmation is less necessary, I agree. I've had it off quite often to conserve RCs. Still, I like it on because of the confirmation part. I've noticed that when it's off, the bot gets a lot of second attempts, third attempts, etc. by the same person. No doubt they figured it didn't go through, so they just try again.

Spamminess and unreadable posts is one thing I worry about. I try to whittle the LUV and HBIT response down to bare bones. It's also one reason behind the move to cut back on mass "!" commands. One thing is for sure on this, pleasing everyone isn't possible. Just got to try to do the best we can. Thank you for your feedback and thoughts on this. !LUV !hbit

Sort:  

@rarej, @crrdlx(4/4) sent you LUV. wallet | market | tools | discord | community | daily

⚠ The LUV command will soon require a limited number of other "!" commands accompany it. Details here.

Success! You mined .9 HBIT & the user you replied to received .1 HBIT on your behalf. mine | wallet | market | tools | discord | community | <>< daily

⚠ HBIT will soon require a limited number of other "!" commands accompany it. Details here.

Understandable. So far you are doing a good job of managing expectations and the goals of the tokens though. I'm sure a good solution will present itself if things were to change in the future.

!LUV

Thank you for your words. I've been delaying making any changes, but likely this week. :) !LUV

@rarej, @crrdlx(1/4) sent you LUV. wallet | market | tools | discord | community | daily

⚠ The LUV command will soon require a limited number of other "!" commands accompany it. Details here.

@crrdlx, @rarej(1/3) sent you LUV. wallet | market | tools | discord | community | daily

⚠ The LUV command will soon require a limited number of other "!" commands accompany it. Details here.

Are you needing more delegations to keep the bot running?

No, right now things are good. Thank you so much for even thinking of it and asking! 😃

The RCs can always be checked at https://hiveblocks.com/@luvshares and we've been holding steady in the 80s and 90s lately. It's all about the see saw between the spend rate and replenish rate of RCs. And right now we're tipped in the okay direction.

Thank you again for asking. !LUV

@metzli, @crrdlx(2/4) sent you LUV. wallet | market | tools | discord | community | daily

⚠ The LUV command will soon require a limited number of other "!" commands accompany it. Details here.