Nowadays people are misusing their power in most of the sector and almost in every platform. You got good people and bad people everywhere and in every platform. But what I feel is to raise your voice. Silent can never be a solution. Yes! I am sufferer and so of course I want to know my mistake and take lesson from it and want other people to know and learn it.
Our conversation that happen, please check out the image.
According to @hivewatcher
- Everything was intentional
- Selected the curator tags
- Tiny source
- You are not new around
EXPLANATION
EVERYTHING WAS INTENTIONAL
No, nothing was intentionally because if it was so then I would not have mentioned the source later on. When I got an appeal message to contact on discord, I immediately recheck the post, try to sort out the problem and solved it. Then according to the message, “I contact on discord, explained the reason and the rest is history now.” How can someone judge person’s intention without prove?SELECTED THE CURATOR TAG
Seriously, you are saying so? Don’t you know why person uses tag? Tag are selected according to the content and moment. These sketch made me written the content and remained me, how I used to draw and sketch in art classes then why won’t I select art section? If my content matches with the tag then why won’t I select?TINY SOURCE
How can a source be tiny or big? What type of attack is that? Okay! Even if I added this tiny source then why I think that deserves to be monetised because source is source doesn’t matter tiny or big, what matter is source should be specific and genuine.YOU ARE NOT NEW AROUND
Yes, I am not new but a human being. I mentioned, it was slipped of mind. By the way, this was my first post on hive and even my early post on steemit was long before, almost two years ago and as I didn’t recheck so couldn’t recognised.
According to @hivewatcher
- You have not drawn it
- Buying the art doesn’t give you to pretend to be the author.
- Buying an art/image does not give you right to monetise it as the main highlight of the post.
EXPLANATION
DRAWN IT
In the content or context no were mentioned, I have drawn it. It’s the moment that have been shared what I feel after watching the image.AUTHOR
I am not the author therefore i mentioned the source. Interested people can click on the source and get to know all.HIGHLIGHT
If only picture was the main highlight then I would not add any content or description. In the application no were was mentioned about the name of the author who have drawn the sketch or developer who have code. How can I mention the name? Therefore I added the source to understand.
According to hivewatcher,
- Explained but was no logic
- Fraud Accusation is made without prove
EXPLANATION
ACCUSATION
I was watching a video, suddenly this app pop on my phone during advertisement. That time, I feel like installing it as I love doing sketch. So, I opened it, liked it, loved the image, tired it and share it on hive. Seeing the image whatever came in my mind, I wrote it. Later on, I do mentioned the source which directly takes you the main source. Interest people can definitely click on the app and get to know all. Now it’s their wish, they draw it sketch it or edit picture of themselves it totally up to them. In classes, you are given a title and then you create situation by your imagination. That doesn’t make you a fraud? In examination hall they provide you picture and tell you to write whatever comes to your mind, that doesn’t make others deceived. The sketch remain me of art classes where my teacher used to add description with demonstration. I just demonstrated in that way, thought of that moment, created situation and wrote it down with demonstration. By the way, even in the application that I install no were mentioned the name of the author so I shared the source of the application. Maybe, the owner paid more to the author or developer not to mention the name, anything can be but that’s between the developer and owner and not our headache as far as I mentioned the source, I have done my job. This have been explained several times but due to arrogant nature hive-watcher don’t want to accept it.LUCK AND LOGIC
In the image you can check it out one of the user told wait for the good time or hence leave to the luck. Now time and luck is going to solve the problem. If luck and the curators mood going to decide everything then what’s the community for? When it comes to illogical explanation how can it be accepted just because you are in a community are we bond to accept even your mistakes and coming to the topic of taking lesson for real, how can I take lesson for real life if you don’t clarify?
According to @hivewatcher,
- List of blacklist or banned list
- Abuses on certain content
EXPLANATION
BLACKLIST OR BANNED LIST
According to his text I came to know there are two type of blacklist, one is temporary and the other one is permanent. What are the criteria for banned lists? When it was asked, no answer and respond was given. No rules are mentioned and no regulations are set. According to their liking and disliking things are being set.ABUSES
Lists or descriptions are not mentioned in the channel. What’s abuse or what’s not people might wonder. Many options are given in the platform so they have set to utilise. All FAQ and rules are being explained on sites, please go and check before attacking someone.
Mistakes should be accepted and community should pay more attention to curators activists as few curators be arrogant and show attitude.
- MISTAKES
Mistakes should be accept doesn’t matter with position you hold. Investigation should be done before judging anyone. As you can see the curator himself mention 5 times later he said was twice same way mistake can happen by anyone better to accept rather then misusing the power and being arrogant. He himself didn’t accept rather shown attitude. That’s how you deal with the people in this platform, that’s how you misuse position that you own.
Only two sections are provided, lack of information and nothing is organised.
COMMUNITY
The intention of the community is superb eminence but the people they select for the position to place should be verified and then set. Position holders should know their duty and of course claim need to be investigate and should fulfil their duties with great responsibility definitely with proof and evidence.
Image Source
RULES AND REGULATIONS
How come a community doesn’t set any rules and regulations. Having a community doesn’t mean you own the platform or the owner’s account. The community should have set rules and regulations and mention everything on the channel. If rules and regulations are not mention how can people know with what perspective is been judge?
Image Source
PRINCIPLE
How can a community play great role on the platform if it’s not organised. No principles or discipline are set on the channel. No information is described. The only way to solve the problem is through chat and after chatting if you don’t listen to them or don’t agree with them you are banned or been blacklisted. If this is so then were are the morals of the community?
Image Source
POWER
Power comes with great responsibility therefore use your power with proper proof and validity. How can a community blame without evidence? How can a community call fraud without proof? Claim should be valid with specific reason, evidence and prove. Problem should to be discuss and need to investigate then with proper prove and evidence punishment needs to be set.
Image Source
CRITERIA
What are the criteria for selecting a post to downvote? By what perspective do they evaluate people for permanent blacklist and for temporary blacklist? If they support original and genuine content then how come they downvote original content just because that person is blacklisted or banned in their community. Isn’t it the misuse of downvote? Isn’t is called spamming? It’s it the disagreement on rewards?
Image Source
REQUIREMENTS
There are four requirements for downvote. They are disagreement on rewards, fraud or plagiarism, hate speech or trolling and misuse categories content or spam. If any post or blog falls into these category then the community do have full rights to downvote and if the person is in their banned list due to before mistake but after consulting didn’t form any kind of spamming and make original content then they have no right to downvote in genuine content. If they do so then it’s the misuse of the power and called hypocrisy.
Image Source
NEGATIVE PUBLICITY
The community keeps on downvoting even if the content is original due banned or blacklist purpose. This reason can cause potentially devastating consequences in the platform. The community’s reputation will badly be hamper for certain members or curators. It’s fact situation that will be experience which might be unpleasant, depressing and harmful for the community.
Image Source
RESPONSIBILITY
Responsibility comes with great power and everyone can’t handle it. The high power is provided to build a community to help others but with the same power some small group of people in the community is misusing it. If a person doesn’t like someone, he or she just can’t go to their post and start downvoting because there are some principles we need to follow and respect according to the platform. If one’s hive power is more then someone, doesn’t mean have to misuse it. We all should have an ethics and then think of earning it. If you genuinely want hive to grow then remember every hive power matters.
Image Source
POLITICS
Community that claims, we are against spammer they themselves playing a role as spammer. Only to get reward, benefits and relationship they choose people according to their choice. Mainly they vote with full power to their community members or curators and rest they distribute to the content creators. So, isn’t that a politics? Community set their own rules according to their liking and disliking. They want to rule the platform by their hive power among their own community members and curators.
Image Source
STRATEGIES
Strategies and plans can be make but definitely need to keep in mind that platform shouldn’t be misuse by plagiarism. Many people get very little support for the work invested and most of them don’t get recognise therefore as it’s an earning platform people can have different strategies and plan to increase hive power by their won and there is no harm until and unless you don’t misuse the options that are provided by the platform.
Image Source
OPTIONS
There are many options in this platform, you just need to do little research and set your target and goal. By investment you can do passive income but there are some morals, rules and ethics you need to keep in mind. Some list of options are given below. Read it and if you wish, can follow it.
- Hive power can be increase by investing money on buying hive or hbd even by investing time.
- Vote for whales and get high amount of curation reward due to that most of the new users don’t get recognise. It’s fine to have your own strategy as it’s an open platform and gives freedom to create your own form.
- Offer for lease or provide lease, can even sell vote among them choose your best option to reach goal.
- Comment, post and vote for yourself and others as well but keep in mind that the post or comment you are voting for should be worth it for the vote value you set.
- According to the community upvoting in your come comments means spamming. If a person invest do have rights to make plans for investment. By the way, if voting for yourself was spam then they could not add the option on their platform for users to utilise. Things to remember, you can vote for your posts or comments but set your vote value according to the comment or post it deserved.
Image Source
PROBLEMS
Yes! It’s an earning platform and sometimes you might do transactions. If people use same site for transaction that doesn’t make spam. People might have less options for transaction as cryptocurrencies are not legal in many countiries therefore it’s very hard to withdraw and get money. Many people do advertisement for sell and the interest person mail or inbox for the transaction. After receiving the money the transfer is done. Judge people by it’s work not by personal staff. Please check out the FAQ and check out the instructions, learn about the rules and no were is mention about the transaction or can’t have multiple accounts or can’t upvote for yourself, everything is fare as far as you maintain rules and regulations. Personal attack should be stop by the communities and allow people to invest, plan and make strategies.
Image Source
HIVE can be one of the best platform if we understand one another, work together and respect one another.
Image source
Thanks for your precious time, thanks for showing your concern, thanks for visiting my blog from the bottom of my HEART.
Hello,
You contradict yourself. First, you say that you drew it:
Then you say that you copied the ready drawing from the app:
Anyway, like we explained multiple times. The content was written in such a way as to deceive the users to think that you are the author of the art and you have drawn it. You did not mention the source and you did not draw it.
The app traced the lines and did the fake drawing steps for you.
You added the source after you were caught.
The original art is not from the app actually but from an artist who drew it in 2015 (as we clearly showed in our source:)
https://vk.com/club94803619?z=photo-94803619_366895902%2Falbum-94803619_216413793
You came to Discord with a particularly arrogant attitude trivializing the situation like it is some sort of a joke and we Hivewatchers are a joke. With no sense of wrongdoing and consequences for art theft/fraud.
@hivewatcher, Hello, hey! Listen don’t say, “we” better you say “I” because you are the one who deal with the issue and you are the one who have been arrogant. You are the one who don’t do homework or research and didn’t investigate. Please don’t come and argue with me without valid reason or prove as I have share all the pictures that we have had conversation with valid proved. As the discord conversation been added please check the image. The sketch remain me of art classes where my teacher used to add description with demonstration. I just demonstrated in that way, thought of that moment, created situation and wrote it down with demonstration. By the way, even in the application that I install no were mentioned the name of the author so I shared the source of the application. This have been explained several times, I posted a blog almost after two years and it was my very first post on hive and as I didn’t recheck the post so couldn’t recognise about the source. Afterwards, when I got an appeal message to contact on discord, I immediately recheck the post, try to sort out the problem and solved it. Then according to message, “I contact on discord, explained the reason and the rest is history now.” but due to your arrogant nature you don’t want to accept it. Coming to point of arrogant attitude. I am the one who have shown gratitude but your are the one who have shown attitude. Hive-watcher is not a joke but you are the one making joke out of it because you are playing with the people of the community. Stop showing extreme level of hypocrisy as you say you support original content but the people you don’t like, you misuse your power to downvote them. Change your behaviour don’t blame the community, do your task properly. Source that you have mentioned cannot be viewed please share it correctly so that it can be view.
You DID NOT provide the source and mention that the art is not yours when you published the post. PLEASE STOP REPEATING THIS FALACIOUS INFORMATION.
Our source has been valid and it does show up correctly:
https://vk.com/club94803619?z=photo-94803619_366895902%2Falbum-94803619_216413793
Congratulations @anikaa! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out the last post from @hivebuzz: