This is really the monster in the room and it makes it tricky for curators as well. I have asked a long time ago about this but I guess, people only picking up how chatgpt works and its technology. Now even some academics use it as a tool to help them refine their research and many more. It's a great tool to summarize, to also help you correct grammar mistakes etc. However, certainly the human aspect to it is something that I think missing. Writing isn't the only one but it's a full set content creation. There are video that can generate content and even record it with a person narrating the story. Oh well, I don't know maybe eventually we will rely on it?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I honestly think the most this will ever really do is be a time saving device. It's not good enough to really replace the human element but it can make writing more accessible and easier for folks who perhaps write in a second language or folks who (as Cliff suggested) might want an AI beta reader, or folks who have trouble with drafts or breaking out of their preferred genre... But it'll always be a tool for us to use and improve upon, and never a end product.