Hi,
I had the same thought about animals that have been bred for specific purposes. Domestication probably led to selective, natural adaptation of dogs to accommodate humans. Then we genetically 'designed' them to exaggerate dependence. So,we can see how dogs would be acutely tuned to our moods (and neuroses).
As limited as this study may have been, I found it enlightening. I'm still dazzled by the heights and surfaces thing. All the dogs I've ever adopted had complicated backgrounds, so they tended to be neurotic in a number of ways...which is in agreement with the finding of 'co-morbidity' described in the article.
Still, my husband and I have found that in time, love and acceptance can work miracles, even with 'damaged' animals. They may not be perfect, but they settle down and return the love.
Thanks for an interesting conversation.
AG
I finally checked out those references. Thank you!
Intuitively, I say,"No", but it might work for the right dog. People become intense when training and that interferes with success, think. We did have a deaf dog once that was impossible to control, so we actually paid a trainer to come to the house. She said the dog was brain damaged! The most she could do was offer us techniques to try and mitigate some of the worst behavior. That poor dog didn't live very long.
Anyway, interesting concept and I might try it with a more "normal" dog, if I had the extra change and needed help. BTW, the human trainer was less expensive.
Take care,
AG