Just FYI, I'm not sure what are the rationale behind your decisions, but today you've removed a witness vote from me but approved a witness who is disabled, i.e. not taking parts in a witness schedule.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Check out the comment I left for him. He's resyncing and should be online soon.
While my witness was offline people still voted for me since I said it will be back online.. so I do the same for that witness.
If he does not come back online eventually I will remove my vote. I don't want to support inactive witnesses.
Fair enough :-) And what you didn't liked about mine if I may ask?
It was nothing personal to you, I just want reduce how many consensus witness votes I have outgoing and give them to smaller witnesses. I will be removing more votes as I need to make room for the smaller guys.
OK, makes sense, thank you, it's out of curiosity because getting a feedback is important. Especially that platform wide approval is decreasing (we've introduced expiring votes, and while it's making a healthier environment, it's also a challenge to keep people continuously engaged in the governance processes).
Its a hard choice to remove many that I have supported for a long time. And knowing everything you have done and continue to do for Hive. I will still support you.
I think Hive is moving in the right direction with expiring votes like that.. As a few up in the top 50 are basically ghosts.
Personally I have a lot of faith in Hive, and glad to have people like you building much of it.