I don't consider that massive. It is less than each of two individual upvotes and there are plenty of other large upvotes as well. I'm expressing my view on the level of rewards.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't consider that massive. It is less than each of two individual upvotes and there are plenty of other large upvotes as well. I'm expressing my view on the level of rewards.
You don't consider it massive. But it is to smaller accounts. It is way MORE than hundreds of smaller votes. There are different perspectives on this.
I understand what you are trying to do and some historical steem/hive issues with other accounts. But it's done at the expense of smaller Hive users.
Yes you have your right or whatever to downvote things that aren't good for the platform. But your personal vendetta (and yes that's all anyone will see it as, regardless of what motive you understand) will only ever be seen as you taking rewards from others.
I know I'm still net up, as with all the other posts you downvote. And I know that my post has done well compared to others. But there is no way Hive will achieve a wider adoption of users and grow if this kind of stuff goes on. If it needs explaining to everyone that got so excited at a big vote, only to have it cancelled by someone else's downvote.
Did you even read my post? Or the previous posts that lead to this final one? Or are you just downvoting smaller accounts because of internal politics?
Regardless of WHO upvoted my post. If you read it, and the previous parts, and still think it's worth downvoting, then fine. I won't agree with you, but I'll accept it.