How about schemes that are less obvious, such as communities receiving benefactor rewards from posters in return for votes such as olio de balena or membership schemes that return upvotes to its members' regardless of post quality.
All @balaenoptera’s stake is powered down and given away on a weekly basis to those who participate in the #untobisunto contest. We already had a talk with @hivewatchers as well about this, having the beneficiaries or not doesn’t change voting at all.
And as I said in a post, since there is no profit for anybody in this initiative, I have no problem sending all the stake to @null and shutting the contest down.
Tagging @libertycrypto27 as the other member controlling @balaenoptera’s keys.
All the non Italian speaking users who were/are adding the 3% + beneficiary are getting votes. Nothing to do with contests!
The beneficiary is by default, people can also remove it, like here for example and nothing changes in voting habits.
Maybe try to understand or ask how it works first.
OK. Whatever you say, you're correct.
This is absolutely untrue and verifiable by doing less superficial research than you did and which I showed you in the comment in which I tagged you