You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Mushroom Protocol 01

in Fungi Lovers • 3 years ago

hey, your identification skills maybe far better that average hivean has 😉

the 1st one to me looks more like Xerócomus subtomentósus, but thats the specie what we have more common here (more to the north and east). the rest is absolutely correct. the one you did not identify, is the one with no distinctive points, so...

warmly welcome to the community! mushroom identification session is a nice idea! may I suggest you to use tag #dna for this?

3 years ago in Fungi Lovers by
$0.00
    Reply 3
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     3 years ago  

    Thank you so much for your comment. I actually still didn't figure out what the top mushroom was, but it's hard from the picture. Maybe I shall be able to figure this one out in the coming weeks. I shall use that tag. this is so kind of you to mention it.

    $0.03
    • Past Payouts $0.03
    • - Author $0.01
    • - Curators $0.01
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     3 years ago  

    sometimes photos (or 1 photo) is definitely not enough for identification.
    sometimes even 50 foto is not enough - just the spore print can do the job!

    '-)

    !ENGAGE 50

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       3 years ago  

      There has already been too much ENGAGE today.

      $0.00
        Reply