I mean that pretty much tells me why it's bonkers why we are not supporting Splinterlands the biggest app on hive. Now yes I do agree that Splinterlands needs to buck up and get their shit in order once this funding goes through but it's clearly a much better use of money over tons of other options that are getting paid right now. LeoFinance you could write off I have a feeling as much as I hate to say it but they are not going to hit user goals and are going to have to pay back the DHF like their promise if they missed the goals. I hope it doesn't come to that but it's not looking the greatest so far.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If Splinterlands was fully funded, it will fall in at $61.98/user/year
Ah makes more sense. Is there no way to pull accounts created and active? In a decentralized blockchain you would think those would be things on record? Of course I don't know enough about the core blockchain itself.
Not really, we have over 2M accounts but ~8,000 actively posting. You could use posts, comments, votes, custom json, there are lots of things you can do, but it isn't an exact science. Top level posts is a good metric, but for example people like Smooth and Freedom don't post, Blocktrades and GTG rarely post but are very active.
Front ends can't really tell who is logged in as it is broadcasts.
In most ecosystems, those who participate are like 10% of the total users the rest are lurkers, but in our case I think that doesn't really hold true due to the rewards. There are certainly lurkers though, but it just can't be quantified. I think "votes" is less reliable as that is more likely going to be 2+ per real user and many voters are completely gone.
I think it is safe to say it is somewhere around 5,000-15,000, but no one really knows.
Autovotes makes it unreliable, as well.
I dont think this was properly titled. This kind of suggests that Splinterlands costs us least per user. top4 at least. which is what you, seems to have concluded looking at this. Instead this just means that Splinterlands got less money than other proposals.
You cant really draw any conclusion from this. Its just a way to show who got most money from the DHF and that is then divided by total user count.
true, but one could also say this shows a little light on overall costs for every DHF for the current active user base (granted if it's accurate) seems kind of crazy that you wouldn't be able to pull very accurate numbers off a blockchain something a little off about that lol.
Its not funded because of insane misuse of funds from past fundraisings & users investments.