Autovotes are easy to not stress about, if you post content you're not that comfortable with receiving a lot of rewards on, you can easily forfeit part to send to @hive.fund (the DHF) or something other non-profit or a project you think should get more rewards. It's of course hard to say how much rewards you're going to get but I think many would appreciate the sentiment and not downvote compared to those who never even think about this and post their daily posts out and lose their minds when downvotes do occur, it's easy to see that they only care about the rewards in some cases.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I have the type of brain that adores making entire mountain ranges out of singular worn down molehills ^_^;
I have considered the sending-to-DHF-fund thing but...
All my posts have beneficiaries (the most I take is 90%). Even years on (I think it's four?) I still have exactly no idea how to evaluate a post. If there was a way to cap the earnings and bleed off excess to DHF or wherever, would me capping my progblogs (which I try for weekly but can vary widly according to my quality standards) at say 20 hive and anything beyond that goes to DHF is that still considered too much? With the current tools I have available on peakd, if I just took 50% of the post payout, is that still too much?
There's not going to be a straight answer for this one XD
and I'm not even considering the people who seem to be against the DHF for whatever reasons
So I currently don't and scream internally the entire time >_>