Part 8/9:
While Pon was acquitted, Stig Engström’s shifting narratives raised suspicion. Eyewitness reports were inconsistent, and his behavior post-murder was suggestive of someone seeking attention rather than truth. Engström exhibited odd reactions throughout the investigation, manipulating facts to garner significance surrounding the tragic event.
His neighbor's ownership of a firearm matching the murder weapon’s specifications raised pivotal questions about whether Engström could have had the means and motive to execute the crime, particularly with psychological analysis suggesting dissatisfaction in his personal life fueling an envious desire for the acclaim Palma possessed.