Part 4/8:
Despite the barrage of insults and unflattering commentary, Amala remained resolute in her defense. She extended an invitation to engage directly, emphasizing her willingness to debate the issues rather than rely on ad hominem attacks (where targeted insults replace substantive arguments).
Amala's request demonstrated an openness rarely found in online interactions, where participants often retreat into heated arguments without resolution. By inviting her critics onto her platform—possibly giving them a broader audience—she positioned herself as both confident and committed to engaging in meaningful discourse.