Part 7/7:
A forthcoming list will highlight various science communicators worthy of support, and contributions from the community to expand this list will further reinforce the resilience of science communication.
Conclusion
In summary, the landscape for science funding in the U.S. is precarious and poses significant risks to the future of scientific research and communication. Individuals passionate about science can take proactive measures to voice their support and directly fund content creators. By doing so, we can collectively ensure that high-quality, educational science content continues to thrive, fostering a well-informed public and a culture that values scientific inquiry. Together, we hold the power to safeguard the future of science communication.