Part 4/8:
In a strategic negotiation scenario, if one actor, say an individual like Trump, threatens an opponent, the opponent interprets the threat based on their expectations. If the opponent views Trump as irrational due to the threat, the most logical response may be to concede. However, this perceived irrationality could potentially be the product of a calculated bluff, creating a complex loop where each party's responses continuously question the legitimacy of the other's behavior.