Part 5/8:
Advocates suggest that formalizing English as the national language could lead to greater administrative efficiency. It could streamline processes within federal agencies, where taxpayer dollars are concerned, particularly in translation services. Critics argue that labeling the order as a practical measure may overlook underlying racial tensions and claims of exclusion relating to immigrants. However, supporters maintain that the focus should be on ensuring that public resources do not stretch too thin and that efficient governance is prioritized.