Part 4/5:
On the other side, Justin Baldoni's attorney, Brian Fredman, communicated appreciation for the judge's decision to deny portions of what he described as an “overbroad protective order.” He stated that they are content with the narrow scope of protections afforded to certain private matters, such as mental health records and personal safety measures.
Fredman further critiqued Lively's request for a large set of documents spanning a timeline of 2.5 years, asserting that the ruling rightly limited that request. He underscored his focus on acquiring necessary communications that would counteract what he termed Lively's "unfounded accusations."