Part 4/7:
Both Oena and Udim articulated the need for the PDP to respect court decisions while also adhering strictly to its constitution. There is a palpable frustration over the interpretation of party rules and the extent to which they allow for individuals to hold multiple roles. While Oena argued for a strict adherence to PDP’s rules as established in their constitution, Udim proposed a more pragmatic approach, emphasizing that survival would mean respecting both the party's internal governance structure and the legal judgments that arise from disputes.