Part 6/8:
Critics of the STJD have voiced their disdain, accusing the tribunal of seeking publicity rather than fairness, arguing its unpredictable nature has contributed to the chaotic landscape of Brazilian football. The juxtaposition of punishing a player while overlooking the provocations from security staff raised serious concerns about consistency and fairness in officiating and adjudication practices.
Fellow commentators lamented that, instead of focusing on players’ performances, there appears to be a inexplicable obsession with penalties and disciplinary actions, diverting attention from the exciting game itself. The ongoing scrutiny even drew comparisons to political maneuvering, suggesting that the tribunal functions like an influential political body as much as a sports authority.