Part 2/8:
The commentator alleges that Ana Thaís Matos is not just prone to controversy for the sake of attention, unlike other commentators who might deliberately say provocative things to gain popularity. Instead, the speaker argues that Matos lacks the fundamental knowledge of football, rendering her commentary ineffective. The analogy drawn is that putting Matos in a debate about football is akin to setting a competitive athlete against someone significantly disabled. It emphasizes the belief that Matos's lack of grasp on the sport disqualifies her from serious analysis.