Part 3/7:
Contrary to the common narrative that attacks on free speech stem directly from judicial or governmental censorship, the speaker clarified that their conflict lies not with the Supreme Court (STF) or any legal entity. Rather, they indicated that real complications arise from a societal manipulation of the rules—an unspoken agreement among certain media factions to stifle dissenting voices.
This frustration was compounded by the realization that censorship often involves collusion among varied factions across the political spectrum, regardless of their ideological stance. The speaker criticized this "mafia-like" mentality—wherein groups conspire to undermine individual expression simply because they fear differing opinions.