Part 5/6:
Further complicating the Hall of Fame induction process are the fates of other finalists. A pointed critique was aimed at the changes in voting rules that made it possible for five senior category finalists to be recognized without any of them actually securing a spot. This change has led to questions about the fairness and initial validation of including them among potential inductees.
The disproportionate treatment of players among different eras raises concerns regarding consistency in Hall of Fame criteria. Observers note that quantifiable achievements must carry weight, but subjective measures like narrative and historical importance often complicate adjudications for who receives enshrinement.