Part 5/7:
Flávio Latif corroborates Danilo’s stance, contending that FIFA’s endorsement of synthetic grass doesn’t absolve the discomfort players feel when playing on such surfaces. He posits that synthetic grass was introduced as a solution to logistical issues, yet fails to offer genuine competitive benefits.
Another perspective raises the idea that players may use the synthetic surface as a scapegoat for broader issues related to scheduling and fitness management. A critical discussion about the relationship between players and management emerges, and there’s an acknowledgment that the ongoing discourse should lead to better field conditions overall.