Part 6/8:
Post-eviction, many involved with the protest have reported severe repercussions. They claimed to be under "Draconian precautionary measures," which led to bans from the campus, restrictions on medical services, and barriers to communicating with witnesses related to their case. These limitations have raised alarm bells about students’ rights and well-being, as they express feelings of isolation and harassment.
Additionally, the university's claim of providing well-being services has faced criticism, with reports of canceled appointments and lack of adequate support. A hearing reportedly took place with a barrister, but the protestors were forced to attend without legal representation, further complicating their struggle for recourse.