Part 6/8:
The defense team has begun formulating its arguments in light of these new developments, with speculation over a possible insanity defense being a focal point of discussion. Legal analysts like Judge George Grasso argue that this defense may be challenging to substantiate, considering the evidence gathered by law enforcement, which depicts a methodical and calculated approach by the suspect.
The defendant’s past—being a valedictorian and coming from a reputable family—has been brought into question as the defense seeks to illustrate how something might have altered significantly in his psyche. However, as the case progresses, the tough evidence against him, including a well-documented plan for the alleged murder, makes it difficult for the defense to mount an effective argument.